Conservablogger Power Quote

"...But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security..." The Declaration of Independence


Friday, March 29, 2013


Dana Lash does a great job making two Progressive monkeys look like Progressive monkeys.


Dr. Benjamin Carson, interviewed by Sean Hannity, expresses his views on homosexual marriage.

It went like this:

HANNITY: All right, last question, we have the issue of the Supreme Court dealing with two issues involving gay marriage. I've asked you a lot of questions. I've never asked you that, what are your thoughts?
CARSON: Well, my thoughts are that marriage is between a man and a woman. It's a well-established, fundamental pillar of society and no group, be they gays, be they NAMBLA, be they people who believe in bestiality. It doesn't matter what they are. They don't get to change the definition. So he, it's not something that is against gays, it's against anybody who wants to come along and change the fundamental definitions of pillars of society. It has significant ramifications.
HANNITY: And you know, it's interesting, Justice Sotomayor brought up the issue of polygamy and incest. Where does the definition stop and I guess, we'll be debating it for weeks and months to come.

Apparently, as reported by Rush Limbaugh, Carson was then rejected (by students) from his speaking role at the Johns Hopkins University Commencement.

Here's the video:



Today, Carson apologized for his choice of words.

Here is that video:

In the next video, Ben Carson explains to MSNBC's Andrea Mitchel, that he will refrain from speaking at Johns Hopkins University commencement.

Visit for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Thursday, March 28, 2013

Watch: Ted Cruz on why he Opposes new Second Amendment Restrictions *Glenn Beck Radio Interview 3/27/13

Among other things, Ted Cruz says Background checks will require a federal registry on all firearms in the United States. Historically, he added, this bodes very poorly for the citizens of other countries where similer actions have taken place. The actions have always led to confiscation.


Bill, they don't have the right to redefine the word marriage. Gays can call it anything else. Let them have a civil union; call it merging.

Like it or not, homosexuals is not condoned by Christianity, neither is fornication or a number of behaviors. The least our society should do is promote moral conduct... as defined by the majority of the nation. Many Americans don't want their children seeing homosexuality (or marriage) as a legitimate lifestyle choice.

I resent your characterization concerned citizens as being 'bible thumpers'.

I did, kind of, like you, but after this, I'm not sure.

I understand we should have a better argument then we put out there, but isn't the goal of having a moral culture a good argument?


The marketplace fairness act is touted as a way of leveling the playing field between brick-and-morter and online retailors (in terms of state sales taxes).

Proponents of this act like it because online retailors in many states don't charge a sales tax and thus have an unfair advantage compared to stores in states that do charge sales tax.

Think about this for a minute.

Suppose this act is passed, the state of New York would be able to audit businesses in other states to ensure they are getting all they are due. States that charge high state taxes would be able to harrass states that have lower, more business friendly taxes.

Here are five reason why this is a bad deal, all the way around.

1. The bill expands state tax authority - State governments will be able to tax across their borders despite clear legal and judicial precedent arguing otherwise. Plus, in the case of an audit, businesses would be required to settle disputes with out of state revenue boards in out of state courts.

2. The bill saddles small business with bureaucratic red tape - Small businesses would be forced to accommodate over 9,000 highly variable state and local tax codes, collection standards, and remittance schedules.

3. The bill threatens privacy - Business and state revenue boards with a track record of losing private information will have more chances to do so.

4. The bill discourages tax competition -- Rather than competing to lower taxes and attract businesses, states will compete to raise taxes on residents of other states.

5. The bill imposes bigger and bigger government - The bill will open the door for further government intrusion into the Internet and for states to reach across their borders for other taxes.
At the end of each year, businesses are responsible for sales tax.
Businesses can choose to tax their customers at the point of sale or pay what they owe in sales tax at the end of the year. Businesses, therefore, act as a tax collection arm for the state in which they are located and are the immediate taxpayer, not the consumer. During an audit, it is the business that is responsible for settling any outstanding balances. The state revenue departments do not pursue consumers over individual purchases; the state revenue departments pursue the business.

Public School Indoctrination? Wisconsin Teachers Bully - Belittle - Conservative Students

This is quite disturbing.  You would think our nation's educators would want to foster free-thinking, mature and responsible young adults, but some educators are, instead, tearing the most aware and lucid students down.

Freedom Works posted this story:

This is just one first hand account illustrating the indoctrination taking place in public schools today.

Becker is the Kid in front in the blue blazer, up front, posing with fellow conservatives.

By   Benji Backer
As a 15 year old, I never imagined my activism in politics would translate into controversy for me at
My name is Benji Backer and I attend a public high school in Appleton, Wisconsin. I have always supported the public school system and plan to do so for the rest of my lifeMany Americans who stand up for the public school system and the unions believe there is no attempt to sway opinion or that students with opposing beliefs are singled outUnfortunately, experiences I have had with harassment and bullying prove that wrong. This is a timeline of the most extreme cases of harassment and indoctrination I have had in the three different public schools I have attended over the last three years. 
I am currently in my freshman year of high school and the incidents are happening more frequently and I believe are more severe.  As you can imagine, the ongoing pressure and bullying has been disturbing to me, my friends and my family.
Just before the 2010 Midterm election, I was on the front page of the local newspaper for my political volunteer work and my teachers noticed. One of my seven teachers made it very clear that she dissaproved of my civic engagement. In a period of two months, my Geography teacher frequently would take me aside after school for a few minutes and tell me how stupid, wrong and misguided I was for being Republican. The harassment with this specific teacher got so bad, I had to switch schools halfway through the year.  At this time I was only 12 years old. To my knowledge, this teacher was not disciplined at all for her actions. 
Two months after I switched to my new schoolScott Walker passed the controversial Budget Repair Bill. Most of the teachers at my new school were more than upset. A couple of my teachers wore red every day while crying, protesting and providing a one-sided perspective on the reforms and making it clear to us just how bad they believed Scott Walker was. One teacher even said she wouldn’t be able to have another child because Scott Walker was cutting so much money from her pay.
A few months later, I expected things to die down and be over with; it didn’t. Almost four months after Walker’s budget was passed, I walked into choir to find a substitute teacher showing us a 5 minute video about how great unions were and then she talked for an additional 10 minutes about how bad she believed Scott Walker to be.  At the end of the class, I stood up, defended the governor and told her how inappropriate her behavior was. I was told she didn’t do that to another class for the rest of the day.
During my 8th grade year I received more attention for my political activity. I had become known in the community because of newspaper, radio and TV interviews and was aware that this would possibly make me a target. Not only was I a volunteer for Governor Walker, but I was a very vocal supporter of him as well. While there were some minor instances of teachers complaining about Walker and a few mentions of my media appearances and such, the rhetoric seemed to be dying down. 
It was a short-lived reprieve.  Things have deteriorated again this year, my freshman year. I came into the year with the knowledge that some teachers would already view me negatively because of my political views and I was correct. 
Right after Scott Walker won the recall election, I started helping out candidates for November. I was named Young Americans for Mitt Romney Co-Chair in Wisconsin and once again, my teachers took notice; my English teacher in particular.  In one of the first weeks of school, he had us write about an article we had read for homework. The article was about political campaigns mining into the personal lives of the American people. He asked, “other than Facebook and phone calls, how do campaigns mine into personal lives?” I raised my hand and replied: “well, you can check who signed the recall.” Immediately after, he said “I signed that!” That was the trigger to the last 40 minutes of class. He spent the remainder of that period lecturing us about how much he hated Scott Walker and explained all the reasons why. He said, “most small business owners and workers take off Fridays and summers”.  According to him, small business owners go golfing every Friday. He also said many businessmen work fewer hours than teachers. He explained how his pay was too low to support his family. He told the class his pay was so bad he had to paint houses in the summers. During this discussion, he was swearing and saying how wrong it was for anyone to support Walker. Students were telling him to stop, and he wouldn’t. 
I decided I would not argue with him. Past experiences had shown me that arguing with someone like him would only make things worse and inflame the situation. Since no one was debating him, these students were being presentea very biased view and placed in a very uncomfortable situation. By the end of class, some students had a completely negative view of Scott Walker.
A couple of days later, he took me into the hall and apologized. He said he had felt bad about it all weekend. He then gave me a book to read about Abraham Lincoln. He told me that “good politicians read a lot.” Then hsaid, “I don’t think Scott Walker likes to read.” The indoctrination and conversations with the class dropped off for a while after this incident, but in mid-October, it started up again. On a regular basis, he would talk about politics in front of the class or in private with me.
The harassment got particularly bad one day in late October, about a week after I was featured in USA Today for my involvement in the upcoming November election.  Again, this video and article was sent throughout the school and was even played in several classes. The same English teacher who had lectured to almost 30 students about a month earlier took me aside during class again. He started talking about Mitt Romney and Scott Walker and his views on them. He reiterated how much harder he worked compared to my dada small business owner, which he had no knowledge of. He went on to ask how much my parents made because he wanted to compare it to his salary.
Later, I looked up this teacher’s salary. He had been making over $100,000 with benefits for the 2010-11 school year, the same year Walker's reform bill passed.  For a few more days, he talked to me in class about his feelings about Walker and Romney. I decided to tell my parents about the two incidents. My parents thought it was very inappropriate and decided we needed to talk to the principal about it. The principal at my school was very upset with the situation. He was disappointed in my English teacher and he told me I needed to talk to my teacher one on one. After I talked to the teacher, my principal said he would meet up with him to follow up. When I went during my lunch hour to talk to my teacher, he apologized and took ownership for everything. Later during the apology, he started to talk about Walker again and how much he hated him. He just couldn’t stop. At the end of the conversation, my teacher asked “you know how you went down to the principal’s office?” I said yes, and he said “I don’t give sh*t.” I asked why, and he went on to explain that he was friends with the principal so it didn’t matter to him and he wouldn’t get in trouble because of their friendship.  (CLICK HERE FOR THE REST OF THE ARTICLE)


Why do I say this is Beck's 'British are Coming plea?  I say this because he is warning us with urgency.   This is a stark warning that our way of life, our future is in jeopardy, and the time to act is now.'

These videos are a must see. We must keep this Common crap curriculum from implementing. Beck doesn't give unsupported testimony here. In fact, he explains and shows the details from the 2009 stimulus plan and other documents.

This is some spooky stuff. The government will be data-mining and some truly hideous things... you have to see this.It's the last push to a government take over of everything, turning us into a China-like country (State Capitalism).

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Ann Coulter Uses Reverse Logic (and Gay Bathhouses) to Attack Bloomberg’s Nanny State Proposals

One of Coulter's fiery comments was, “The behaviors that liberals approve of, they will not stigmatize,” she explained. "Sodomy… they won’t stigmatize. But smoking… if we’re looking at it for health costs, there are plenty of other things.” The segment then, somehow, shifted towards a conversation on “stop-and-frisk,”

Petition to Stop the New Internet Tax - IRS Goons will score big - Infringe on State's Autonomy

From the Conservablogger inbox - From
Dear Patriot,
Below please find a special message from one of our sponsors, Campaign For Liberty. They have important information to share with you. Thank you.

Please note that the following message reflects the opinion and representations of our sponsor alone, and not necessarily the opinion of

Campaign for Liberty

Dear Patriot,

The only thing politicians love more than spending your money is taking more of it.

As early as next week, statists in BOTH parties are set to ram through a new taxing scheme that's been years in the works - the National Internet Tax Mandate.

Should it pass, every man, woman, and child in the country will feel the pinch as Congress takes a MASSIVE bite out of American prosperity.

Campaign for Liberty President John Tate explains below why the National Internet Tax Mandate scheme is so dangerous. Please read his email and take action IMMEDIATELY.

In Liberty,

Dr. Ron Paul

Campaign for Liberty

Dear Patriot,

Call it the Valentine's Day Tax Massacre.

On February 14, 2012, statists in Congress introduced S. 336, the National Internet Tax Mandate.

Of course, the tax-and-spenders sponsoring the bill mislabeled it the "Marketplace Fairness Act."

Designed as a fat Valentine's Day "I LOVE YOU" to big spending politicians, this dangerous bill would hand the federal government massive new controls over state tax policies and set the stage for government at all levels to take another helping of your money via the Internet.

That's why it's critical you sign the petitions I've made up for you DEMANDING your Representative and Senators vote "NO" on the statists' National Internet Tax Mandate scheme.

I'll give you the link shortly, but first let me explain exactly why this is so important...

Currently, because of the Founders' vision for our country, states are "laboratories" - free to set their own tax policies.

High tax, big spending, highly regulatory state governments send businesses and citizens alike fleeing across state lines in search of more liberty.

But under the National Internet Tax Mandate scheme, the statists are setting the stage to bring it all to a crashing halt.

NO Internet Tax Mandate

Under the new National Internet Tax Mandate:

*** All Americans would see their taxes go up as big spending governors of BOTH parties work with the federal government's IRS goons to implement a state sales tax on ALL goods purchased online.

Big spending governors are running their states into bankruptcy, and - instead of reducing spending - they want the IRS to force YOU to bail them out with new Internet taxes!

*** Tax collectors in one state would now be free to pursue retailers across state lines.

For example, if a customer in New York makes a purchase from an online retailer in Texas, that retailer MUST collect New York's exorbitant sales taxes and send it to New York's tax collection agencies;

*** New and higher taxes would CRUSH economic growth and set the stage for massive new regulations that threaten the very existence of the Internet.

Make no mistake.

This is all bad enough on its face.

But it's hardly the end of it.

You and I both know, under the guise of "national security," establishment bureaucrats are already feverishly looking for new ways to trace, track, and register all Americans' online activity.

What you read. What you buy. What videos you watch. What you write about THEM.

Now the one-world socialists at the United Nations want in on the action, as well.

NO Internet Tax Mandate

Just a few months ago, the U.N. drafted a new "Telecommunications Treaty" to impose restrictive regulations, global CENSORSHIP, and a massive new tax on all Internet operations.

If ratified by the United States Senate, the United Nations' "Telecommunications Treaty" - designed to take effect in 2015 - could give control of the Internet to U.N. bureaucrats.

Ultimately, the U.N. hopes to use this scheme to take a tax bite out of the TRILLIONS of dollars exchanging hands via Internet commerce - money that will make the U.N. a true world government.

And this National Internet Tax Mandate is playing right into their hands.

That's why it's so critical you sign your No National Internet Tax Petition and make your most generous contribution of $100, $50, or $35 to C4L IMMEDIATELY.

Even if you can only chip in $20 or $10, it will make a tremendous difference.

Just like the Wall Street bailouts and the recent "deal" over tax hikes, this new National Internet Tax Mandate is "bipartisan" to its core.

And the statists in BOTH parties are determined to RAM this scheme into law quickly before you and I have a chance to react.

Governors from all over the country who literally CANNOT wait to be FORCED to raise taxes are busy bending the ears of Congress.

NO Internet Tax Mandate

Now, some of the loudest voices in Congress are Republicans who think you simply don't care about this critical issue.

But I think you do care.

Will you stand by while the big taxers impose yet another tax on hardworking Americans?

Do you simply shrug your shoulders at the thought of United Nations global socialists shutting down the free flow of information worldwide?

Or will you help me FIGHT BACK?

Please take a moment to sign your petitions DEMANDING your Representative and Senators vote "NO" on the National Internet Sales Tax IMMEDIATELY.

And if you can, please make your most generous contribution to C4L TODAY.

Your generosity will help me alert hundreds of thousands of Americans to this critical fight and stop the National Internet Tax Mandate.

C4L will use mail, email, and hard-hitting Internet ads - and even newspaper, radio, and TV ads, if necessary.

It won't be cheap.

But it will be what it takes to win.

So in addition to signing your petition, won't you please agree to your most generous contribution of $100, $50, or $35 IMMEDIATELY?

Even if all you can do is chip in $10 or $20 to this fight, please do so right away.

There's literally no time to waste.

In Liberty,

John Tate

P.S. Members of BOTH parties in Congress are working feverishly to unleash a new National Internet Tax Mandate.

If passed, the new National Internet Tax Mandate would hand the federal government massive new controls over state tax policies, setting the stage for government at all levels to take another helping of your money via the Internet.

That's why it's critical you sign the petitions DEMANDING your Representative and Senators vote "NO" on the statists' National Internet Tax Mandate scheme - and then make your most generous contribution of $100, $50, or $35 to C4L IMMEDIATELY.

Even if all you can do is chip in $10 or $20 to this fight, please do so right away.

NO Internet Tax Mandate

INCREDIBLE! Planned Parenthood Gets Pro-Life Teacher Fired – Then Holds Sextoy Workshop

This is Disgusting!
Benson High School teacher Bill Diss was fired last week in Oregon after he protested a Planned Parenthood indoctrination class visit.
This week Planned Parenthood put on their sex toy workshop.
afternoon delight
Afternoon Delight

LifeNews reported:

Last week, a Portland, Oregon math teacher was led out of his classroom by police and is expected to be fired for his opposition to Planned Parenthood. For years, Benson High School teacher Bill Diss has protested Planned Parenthood of Columbia Willamette (PPCW) building an abortion facility as well as their infiltration into the city’s schools.

This Fall, he refused to allow Planned Parenthood staffers to come into his class to push their agenda, under the auspices of the Teen Outreach Program – why was this interrupting a math class, of all things? – and ever since, the school’s administration (not to mention PPCW) has had it out for him.

Now that PPCW has completed the heroic task of stopping Mr. Diss, they can go back to their very important, regularly scheduled programing – promoting sex toys!
Tonight, as part of “Sexy Tuesdays,” PPCW is offering a “Sex Toy Workshop & Soiree.”
“An evening of enticing exploration awaits,” they tease in their announcement:
In this class, you will learn about the origin of sex toys and their evolution throughout history. She Bop’s very own AJ (aka Amory Jane) will explain the different types of toys, what they are used for, what they are made from, as well as certain ingredients to be aware of when selecting the best product for you. She will also address how to maintain and store your toys so that you can enjoy them for as long as possible.
Visit The Gateway Pundit for Great News Headlines. <--LINK

Funny as Hell: woman accused of Husband's Stabbing has crying fit after Bond Denial

Woman screams at judge in bond court: MIAMI (WSVN) -- A woman accused of trying to kill her husband was in court Monday morning, where she screamed at a judge and then refused to leave.


Below was another incident with the same judge:


According to reports, this incident took place last week. The news today is that the University did indeed apologize.

“We sincerely apologize for any offense this has caused,” the university said in a statement to Fox News. “Florida Atlantic University respects all religions and welcomes people of all faiths, backgrounds and beliefs.”

The university initially defended the Christ-bashing lesson which is included textbook titled, “Intercultural Communication: A Contextual Approach, 5th Edition.”

Fox News obtained a synopsis of the lesson taught by Deandre Poole, who also happens to be vice chair of the Palm Beach County Democratic Party.

“Have the students write the name JESUS in big letters on a piece of paper,” the lesson reads. “Ask the students to stand up and put the paper on the floor in front of them with the name facing up. Ask the students to think about it for a moment. After a brief period of silence instruct them to step on the paper. Most will hesitate. Ask why they can’t step on the paper. Discuss the importance of symbols in culture.”

Read the full fox news story  by clicking here.

WPEC-TV CB2 NEWS 12 reported:

Conservablogger comment: 

Fat chance  Deandre Poole would use the name "Barak Obama" or "Muhammad", huh?!


A letter from from Senators Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Mike Lee (R-Utah)   will arrive to the office of senate majority leader Harry Reid sometime today that warns opposition to any further gun control legislation.

 “We will oppose the motion to proceed to any legislation that will serve as a vehicle for any additional gun restrictions,” the signed letter reads, according to a copy obtained by Politico. <-LINK

The Blaze reported this as well stating that the Senate could push a benign bill out of committee that would only limit magazine capacity and expand background checks, but once it comes out for general debate, amendments can be added to it making it much more ominous. 

No one is actually saying they will filibuster, but the warning is pretty clear in that the opposing Senators have little other recourse.

Monday, March 25, 2013


You can tell this is from an earlier time when the media made more sense. There is no way in hell they would allow a story like this to go out over the airwaves today.

Friday, March 22, 2013

Thursday, March 21, 2013


I saw this while surfing Youtube and decided to share.


During the, now infamous Obama prayer breakfast, Dr. Benjamin Carson stood and showed tremendous courage when he shreddd the very ideology of Obama.

Dr. Rand Paul stood and displayed his courage with a fiery, thirteen hour Senate filibuster, in which he demanded an administration answer to the question, "Can the President of the USA use a drone to kill a citizen, on U.S. soil, while sitting at a cafe' sipping coffee?"

Both men put on a display rarely seenin politics today, for whatever reason.

One thing I admire about each man is their courage.  Something else I admire of the men is that they are self-assured.  This remeinds me of the movie, "Tombstone", where wyatt Earp told his brother he shouldn't be sheriff because he wasn't a "deliberate man". 

I share this quote becasue Carson and Paul are, indeed, 'deliberate' men.  I think they are statesmen of historic sigfifcance and their recent actions illustrate this point.

Today, Rush Limbaugh said the left fears Ben Carson because he isn't seen as having an agenda.  In so much as his general disposition, he isn't overbearing, demanding, angry, agitated, victimized by the rich, or blaming caucasions for soceital woes.  In a word, Carson doesn't sound like a Liberal. 

If, as Rush says, the left fears Carson, it is because the left (particularly those in the mdia) don't actually believe their rhetoric - that conservatives are racists, sexists, bigots, homophobes etc- so they fear him because they know (to conservatives)  the importance is placed on what Carson believes and says (his character) that matters,  not the color of his skin.

If this Dream Team ticket were to come about, who should be President, who should be vice President?

The answer would be a complicated one; one I am not qualified to answer.

I detected a strong Christian faith ad resolve in Dr. Carson, and in Dr. Paul I detected a stron sense of constitutional respect.  I love both.  I think they would compliment each other in a way that Obama/Biden could never do.

I say this because neihr Bien nor Obama seem to be particularly vested in religion or the constitution.  Theyactually seem to be hostil to it assaulting the each amendment several times.

So, to the powers that be:  If you want to save the country, consider Carson/Paul 2016.  This is a ticket America would love.

(Typo fixing to follow)


I'm glad to know some folks there are able to detect B.S. when they hear it.

Watch: The Five's Bob Beckel Blasts CBS over 'Amazing Race' communist Vietnam Propaganda

The Five's, Bob Beckel, usually turns me off with his unfair rhetoric, but here is one time when I like what old Bob says.

He exclaims that CBS can take this show and "shove it"!  

I couldn't agree more.

The next video was the next day:

Wednesday, March 20, 2013


First secure the borders!


I'm not sure when the attempted character assault happened, but a CNN host slandered Glenn Beck with a edited lead-in audio piece where Beck is heard saying, "Obama is the anti-Christ" several times.

Glenn Beck and company  took time to refute this nonsense today on their radio program.  They did a thorough job.

It turns out that every one of the Beck statements were taken out of context, and some were from the same conversation.

Beck never said that he believes Obama is the anti-Christ and meant it.  He did say that Obama is NOT the dude.

Listen to the explanation:

Saturday, March 16, 2013


From the conservablogger inbox:

In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama's qualifications for the presidency, the group "Americans for Freedom of Information" has Released copies of President Obama's college transcripts from Occidental College ... Released today, the transcript school indicates that Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia as an undergraduate. The transcript was released by Occidental College in compliance with a court order in a suit brought by the group in the Superior Court of California. The transcript shows that Obama (Soetoro) applied for financial aid and was awarded a fellowship for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program. To qualify, for the scholarship, a student must claim foreign citizenship.

This document would seem to provide the smoking gun that many of Obama's detractors have been seeking. Along with the evidence that he was first born in Kenya and there is no record of him ever applying for US citizenship, this is looking pretty grim. The news has created a firestorm at the White House as the release casts increasing doubt about Obama's legitimacy and qualification to serve as President article titled, "Obama Eligibility Questioned," leading some to speculate that the story may overshadow economic issues on Obama's first official visit to the U.K. In a related matter, under growing pressure from several groups, Justice Antonin Scalia announced that the Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to hear arguments concerning Obama's legal eligibility to serve as President in a case brought by Leo Donofrio of New Jersey . This lawsuit claims Obama's dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as president.. Donofrio's case is just one of 18 suits brought by citizens demanding proof of Obama's citizenship or qualification to serve as president.

Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation has released the results of their investigation of Obama's campaign spending. This study estimates that Obama has spent upwards of $950,000 in campaign funds in the past year with eleven law firms in 12 states for legal resources to block disclosure of any of his personal records. Mr. Kreep indicated that the investigation is still ongoing but that the final report will be provided to the U.S. Attorney general, Eric Holder. Mr. Holder has refused to comment on the matter...
Subject: RE: Issue of Passport?

While I've little interest in getting in the middle of the Obama birth issue, Paul Hollrah over at FSM did so yesterday and believes the issue can be resolved by Obama answering one simple question: What passport did he use when he was shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi ?

So how did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later?

And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi , what passport was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration?

The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers. It makes the debate over Obama's citizenship a rather short and simple one.

Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?
A : Yes, by his own admission.

Q: What passport did he travel under?

A: There are only three possibilities.
1) He traveled with a U.S. Passport,
2) He traveled with a British passport, or
3) He traveled with an Indonesia passport.

Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981?

A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981.

Conclusion: When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport.
If he were traveling with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims.. And if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend to prove that he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967.

Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a "natural born" American citizen between 1981 and 2008.

Given the destructive nature of his plans for America, as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better.
If you Don't care that Your President is not a natural born Citizen and in Violation of the Constitution, then Delete this, and then lower your American Flag to half-staff, because the U.S. Constitution is already on life-support, and won't survive much longer.
If you do care then Forward this to as many patriotic Americans as you can.


Friday, March 15, 2013


He was freakin' awesome, wasn't he?

Guess what?  He still is.



Here are some pull-quotes from Trump's speech:

"We are in serious, serious trouble!"  Donald Trump opens with.

"The President is given unprecidented media protection.  But for Republicans, it's just the opposite."

"To solve our problem we have to build a great economy."

"We don't make televisions in this nation anymore."


Tells Biden, "you keep your advice, we'll keep our guns" Referencing Biden's 'Two Blasts' outside the house.


This is a fastenating call that Limbaugh received on wednesday's program.

Rush wants to know why this man, Robert, in South Lake Texas (a life-long Democrat), changed his positions on Obama/Limbaugh, and how long  it took to change.

Limbaugh picks Roberts brain on the Limbaugh comment made in 2009 expressing a desire that 'Obama fails'.  This comment did anger him, Robert said.   The media used the comment to imply that Limbaugh is a far right-wing racist cuck, he added.

The first part of this caller's audio is missing.  In that portion, Robert explained he became a listener to the so-called 'right-winged' alternative conservative media, where the personalities make sense.  Hanitty, Beck, Limbaugh Levin all have his attention now. 

Robert said lots of people are waking up, becoming aware of the damage Obama is inflicting on the nation. 

"Obama went too far!"  "He's kicking the walls down!"  "He tried to do too much to soon",  are a few of Roberts's statements.


Rand Paul is awesome!  This is the future of the Republican party.  We need to put out the old guard and usher in people standing for OUR interests.

Thursday, March 14, 2013


She's seen bullets that "implode"? 

She doesn't actually answer the Cruz question, does she. 


What is it about America that makes it exceptional? Are we exceptional because we are better than others?

No. Our nation is exceptional because we rule ourselves. 

We are exceptional because we have the largest middle class, most well off populace in the world, because we have been the most free to choose our own paths.


We are exceptional because we are the nation (at least we are supposed to be) where everyone has the same shot at getting ahead. We have the rule of law that equalizes all our people.


Allen West is one of the good guys.

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

WATCH: George Stephanopoulos interviews Obama on ABC, 3/13/13 Explains WH cancellation of Tours

Obama says, "We're not going to balance the budget..."   Did anyone think this was an Obama  goal?

Listen to his explanation of the White House tours being halted.  What a pile of B.S.!

You know damn good and well the President told them to cancel WH tours.  If he wanted, he could tell them to re-open tours.  What a crock of crap!


Is this a new conservative hero?  I like this Andy Harris character already!  I appreciat anyone who refuses to keep quiet in the face of the left's (Obama's) lies.

Here's the video:

Tuesday, March 12, 2013


Breitbart Reported:

Senate Democrats, including Senate Budget Committee chairwoman Sen. Patty Murray, are hiding their budget from their Republican colleagues, Breitbart News has learned exclusively. Murray did share her budget plan with her Democratic colleagues on Tuesday.

The article by Matthew Boyle reported at least one theory explaining this lack of disclosure by Senate Democrats:

 “I think it speaks volumes about Senate Democrats’ fear of the American people that they must hide their plan until they’ve first had a chance to mislead the media about it,” the Senate GOP aide said in an email. “If they had courage and confidence their plan would be popular, they would have been on the Sunday shows and holding press conferences bragging about it, as did Chairman Ryan. Instead, it’s leaks and crickets.”



 You know, I just got finished arguing with a guy on Facebook.  I argued that  the left (the media) is dishonest.  The guy was pointing his finger at us, and I was pointing my finger at them.

This, however, illustrates my point.  I told the guy we should meet on the battlefield of ideas.  Dems, the left, Progressives shouldn't hide their desires.  I said, and to Senate Dems, I say, don't hide your desires.  Put it out there and let the chips fall where they may.

But, I know they don't have the guts to do that.  They have to lie and plot, and scheme.  They know they oppose liberty and the free market, they know they oppose our free ownership of firearms, they know they oppose our right to religious expression and that we aught to be able to keep what we earn.

They know they oppose those things, yet they won't just come out and say it.  They want high taxes, they want Cloward and Piven type collapse.  Put it out there and, like I said, let the chips fall where they may.