Jim Graves - a 'Grave' Mistake for Minnesota Voters

To the voters of Minnesota:  Voting for Jim Graves would be a 'GRAVE' MISTAKE.  We don't need any more folks in Washington DC lacking moral and patriotic character.

We surely do not need more Democrats in Congress!  Democrats today are nothing more than Communists with a different name.

We don't need folks who plan to redistribute and diminish America's wealth.

How can I say this?  Look at what's been happening over the past several years.   

We need honest fiscal conservatives holding that post, not a Marxist in disguise... that is, in disguise until you see his voting record).

If you are smart, Minnesota voters, you'll keep Michele Bachman in office.  It's evident to me that she stands for the truth, even when the truth isn't popular.  She's courageous, not a coward like that liar, Jim Graves.

Bachman has the kind of character we need in Washington. 

Check out Michele Bachman's new ad refuting the lies coming coming from the Graves' campaign.



If you would like to contribute to Michele Bachman's Campaign, she could really use the help. CLICK HERE TO CONTRIBUTE TO MICHELE BACHMAN'S CAMPAIGN.

Republican Primary Candidates - Conservablogger Revised Opinions

Okay,  we've got just a few candidates left in the Republican Primary  that I would be comfortable voting for.

Here are  my opinions of the candidates:

Romney is out because he's a RINO who has no solid convictions.  He seems to tell folks what they want to hear, flip-flopping like a landed trout.  He's also the one we are being force-fed by the traditional Republican machine.

Perry is out because of his lack of conviction on illegal immigration... that illegals (undocumented residents) should not get preferential treatment or  tuition breaks. He's another candidate we were being spoon-fed by the traditional Republican  machine.

Cain is out because he is actually out.

Gingrich is out because he 'sat in a tree with Palosi' singing kumbiyah over bullcrap climate science.  Too bad too.  I actually like his knowledge on subjects important to the person who occupies  the presidency.

Ron Paul is out because he, sadly, has some views of foreign policy regarding Israel, that I can't support.  If not for that, I'd probably support this guy.

Huntsman, I never considered him because he's an Obama appointee who was the Amabssador to China.  That's not to say he has done anything - I know of - to discount him, but Obama wouldn't have selected him if he weren't a yes man.  That means he's a RINO too. (in my sad opinion).

Who does that leave?  Bachman and Santorum.

I think Michele Bachman knows the gravity of the upcoming election the most, and she's the only one stressing its importance.  Additionally, she seems to know better than anyone what it's going to take to save our Republic.  She also has good foreign policy experience being on an important cabinet position as Congresswoman.

Rick Santorum?  So far, he hasn't messed up in a way that's made the news.  To be honest, I don't actually know enought about him to formulat an accurate opinion. I do know he is a true conservative and lots of conservatives appreciate his convictions.

So, up to this point, If I were voting tomorrow I would vote for Bachman. 


Then the question arises, could Michele Bachman beat Obama in the November election?  I think once she can devote her resources to exposing Obama's failed policies, she'll do great.

The media who, backed by unions and government, will be doing everything in its vast sphere of influence to re-elect Obama, but if Bachman clearly and passionately explains how her policies  are better for America, she'll still win. 

Bachman's Straw Poll win 'Just Another Straw on the Back of 'Business-as -usual'

By winning the Iowa straw poll, I believe Michele Bachman will continue to move the other candidates toward the right side of the political spectrum. 


There are many votes that the eventual Republican nominee will want to call his own in order to win  the presidential election.


Take her straw poll win in conjuction with last November's election landslide, and you get a field of candidates who  must openly celebrate and promote  their conservative values.


So, I am greateful to Michele Bachman for hanging in there.  I respect her will-power  and focus on doing the right things for America.

Whether she is nominated or not, she and her Tea Party have changed the discussion.

News Report of Bachman's Win... they also talk about mit Romney and Rick Perry.
~FROM THE ASSOCIATED PRESS~

Magazine's Politics Evident in Bachman Articles

The New Yorker and the Newsweek have recently written articles that delve into Michele Bachman's rise in the political spectrum. 

They attempt to paint Bachman as a radical whose beliefs are outside of even most conservatives. 

FOR MORE INFO ON THESE ARTICLES, CLICK HERE - FOR THE FIREWIRE PIECE ON THIS TOPIC.

Conservablogger Comment:
This is pure propaganda and its coming from a position of fear.  Progressives such as those in Media Matters don't want or like strong-independant minded-conservative-women gaining footholds in national politics, so they marginalize. 

In these articles they make Bachman out to be 'crazy', inconsistant, and otherwise unfit.  I think Bachman should take every opportunity that comes along to speak to America.

I, for one, cant hear her speak enough.   I believe the more people learn about her,  from her, the better off her campaign will be.

I don't think she needs to spend all her time directly refuting any charges.   I'm simply saying she should keep speaking about policies, her beliefs, her titanium backbone, and all the things that set her apart form the croud.

The left right now is afraid because they see their socialist , marxist one-world-government-crap coming apart at the seems. 

We can't get lazy. 

America, we must keep our families informed.  Use twitter, facebook and every social media at your disposal to shed sunlight on all leftist propaganda you encounter.

By keeping eachother informed, crap planted in rags like the two publications at the beginning of this post, will never take root and spread.

Video - Michele bachman: Repeal only takes 50 plus 1

Congresswoman and former presidential Candidate, Michele Bachman,  weighed in with her account of today's Supreme Court ruling  and her reaction.

She is a true conservative.

Michele Bachman warns of Reeducation Camps

What is Obama's agenda for the so-called 'voluntary service' of young people?  Will it continue to be voluntary?


Michele Bachman keeps us on our toes in this radio show interview.


There's going to come a point when we Americans will have to make serious decisions.  I hope, for liberty's sake, we make the right ones.

Conservablogger - Thoughts on the Fox News / Google Republican Debate Thursday

Thursday’s evening republican debate was interesting.
front runners, Perry and Romney (I feel) came off as boring and calculated. I did not feel their commitment to following the constitution.

I was dissappointed when the Youtube chat window quit working during the debate.  I was ready to cheer and jeer, but sadly, was unable.  So, here are my thoughts:


Ron Paul’s remarks stuck out the most for me, because he spoke of the constitution as something he thinks our nation has been violating. I believe he is right, and I think if he were President, he would fix a lot of what is wrong.

Michele Bachman was also strong. She spoke of constitutional conservatism, and I could sense her passion and dedication to those principals.


I think a great ticket would be Paul and Bachman., or Newt Gingrich and Bachman.


I don’t like Gingrich because he has been connected with the politics of our nation for some time and has, in some way, helped get us here.

Newt spoke of a new contract with America that he plans on introducing next Thursday. I think Newt was probably the most intelligent person in the room.

John Huntsman had a great moment when he spoke of his neighbors two dogs creating more shovel ready jobs than Obama has.


All the candidates had a chance to voice how they would change things.

Herman Cain spoke of a 9-9-9 plan. 9 percent income tax, 9 percent sales tax and 9 percent corporate tax. This seems a lot better than what we have now.


Herman also spoke of the lack of leadership in the White House and standing up for Israel.  Here are his remarks where he says, "if you mess with Israel, you mess with the USA.."


Rick Santorum said Obama is the new King George III.  That he (Obama) thinks he can tell people what to do from on high. Here's the video of what he said:


Each candidate had moments. I didn’t care for Perry or Romney. These guys are too spit and polished… to much of the type of Republicans that leads us in the same direction as liberals… accept maybe a little slower.


We need an extreme candidate for these extreme times.


So far, I have to say, I like Ron Paul.

Watch the Complete ABC/YAHOO IOWA Debate Aired on 21/10/11

I think the moderators were unfair with the time, allowing Romney and Gringrich to monopolize more than a fair amount of time.


And I'm not surprised.  This is a 'mainstream' media outlet, after all, and mainstream is progressive (not in a good way), in a liberal left wing 'they know what's better for us than we do' sort of way way and want to point voters toward another of their kind.


Check it out and see if I am mistaken:

Conservabloggerl Opinion:

I  think Gingrich lost some of his earlier luster.  He did look frazzled, and he seemed awash with defensiveness.  

Romney was the same old Romney;  nothing new here.  His performance didn't improve my opinion of him at all. 

Perry's performance this time was better than his last few performances.  However, he still wasn't believable to me about social issues, and illegal immigration.

Ron Paul, except for one of his foreign policies concerning protecting Israel was fantastic.  He really stood apart from the pack by relentlessly identifying the cause of our nations  financial - fiscal - problems.

Rick Santorum Was very good.  He seemed to grasp the idea of having to fight for our nation.  When he explained how he won a district of Pennsylvania (as a conservative candidate) that is 60 percent Democrat, told me he's a fighter.  He has a great grasp of American exceptional ism, has a great working knowledge of Washington.  He is also a strong advocate for Israel.  Santorum would make a good president, but is he the right person for this time in history?

Michele Bachman was strong, direct, and fearless.   I think she is great, but mainstream has a way of black-balling her. 

(They do this with Ron Paul too.)   She won the straw Poll here earlier this year, and the media came out attacking her.  She continues to point out that she is the "clear consistent conservative" on the panel, and I believe her (as I believe Paul's and Santorum's consistency is unquestionable.)  That said,  will the media ever give her a chance?  I don't think so.  And if they don't give her a chance, does she have a chance to with the presidency?