The justice Dpt is blowing a bunch of hot air. They are making a statement to the latino community that they are 'for the hispanics'. This is pure politics.
I hope Joe keeps on investigating Obama's past.
The purpose of this blog is to conseerve the values and ideals that this country (The USA) was founded on. You'll find political commentary here ranging from my disdain for porgressive liberalism to my love of the constitution. Frequent posts will expose factions that are fundamentally transforming America... Beginning with our president.
Conservablogger Power Quote
"...But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security..." The Declaration of Independence
Friday, May 11, 2012
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
""Holding a Hammer" song Got the writer/performer fired From a Public School
I'm paraphrasing the story as I've heard it.
The guy who wrote and performs this song was a public school coach in Tennessee. Apparently, because of the political nature of the song, he was canned.
You should give it a listen. Can you guess why the guy was fired?
The guy who wrote and performs this song was a public school coach in Tennessee. Apparently, because of the political nature of the song, he was canned.
You should give it a listen. Can you guess why the guy was fired?
Tea Party: Let's Boot the RINOs out of Washington!
From the Conservablogger Inbox:
Dear Patriot,
If there was any doubt that old guard establishment Republicans in the Senate need to go, Sen. Tom Coburn (OK) removed them Tuesday night during an appearance on the Daily Show with Jon Stewart. In what seemed a malicious attempt to minimize the Tea Party influence in November, Coburn threw the largest grassroots movement our country has ever seen under the bus driven by President Obama.
Since he is not facing reelection this year, Coburn is playing the attack dog against the Tea Party giving cover to the likes of Sen. Dick Lugar (IN) and Sen. Orin Hatch (UT), both of whom are facing strong challenges to retain their self appointed status of "Kings of the Senate". Help us spread the message that America cannot afford this kind of politician with a contribution --HERE--
This sort of capitulation by Republicans is exactly why America is losing our status as an economic super power. During the interview, Coburn practically dismissed the danger of an out of control national debt, showing his disconnect with the economic realities we are facing as a nation. It seems that his personal vendetta against the Tea Party is more important than doing the job voters hired him to do.
The tea party movement would not have been necessary but for these spineless politicians who refuse to make the needed choices to rein in spending, focusing rather on what will win them the next election. America needs real leadership, not more capitulation by self serving politicians.
Help us expose those politicians who have not only forgotten who they represent but could not seem to care less that they are affecting the future of every American through their weakness. Your support is critical and we thank you for your patriotism and commitment to making a difference
P.S. Our strength is in numbers. Please help our efforts by forwarding this message to a friend.
Conservablogger comment:
We did, in fact, hock up the Lugar and spit him out. I'm not sure how the other RINO fared, but I'm sick of the established old Republican dead heads who go along to get along. They worry only about their reelections rather than the health and viability of our republic.
The Old establishment Republicans need to go along with the Progressive liberal Democrats. They are the reason our nation is in such trouble. Wanting to be fiscally responsible shouldn't be frowned upon, but it is.
They want us to compromise, but their definition of compromise is giving them every thing they want. Some one has to have the guts, and the leadership skills to cut the crap and get to work fixing our fiscal house.
We, The Tea Party, need to select people to run against the establishment who will get in there and assume the power the constitution gives us. We need to repeal much of the regulations that is smothering industry and forcing jobs out of America.
We've got to incentivize investment and ethical behavior in all government departments.
We've got to run the leaches out of Washington, and make it the limited government it is meant to be.
Dear Patriot,
If there was any doubt that old guard establishment Republicans in the Senate need to go, Sen. Tom Coburn (OK) removed them Tuesday night during an appearance on the Daily Show with Jon Stewart. In what seemed a malicious attempt to minimize the Tea Party influence in November, Coburn threw the largest grassroots movement our country has ever seen under the bus driven by President Obama.
Since he is not facing reelection this year, Coburn is playing the attack dog against the Tea Party giving cover to the likes of Sen. Dick Lugar (IN) and Sen. Orin Hatch (UT), both of whom are facing strong challenges to retain their self appointed status of "Kings of the Senate". Help us spread the message that America cannot afford this kind of politician with a contribution --HERE--
This sort of capitulation by Republicans is exactly why America is losing our status as an economic super power. During the interview, Coburn practically dismissed the danger of an out of control national debt, showing his disconnect with the economic realities we are facing as a nation. It seems that his personal vendetta against the Tea Party is more important than doing the job voters hired him to do.
The tea party movement would not have been necessary but for these spineless politicians who refuse to make the needed choices to rein in spending, focusing rather on what will win them the next election. America needs real leadership, not more capitulation by self serving politicians.
Help us expose those politicians who have not only forgotten who they represent but could not seem to care less that they are affecting the future of every American through their weakness. Your support is critical and we thank you for your patriotism and commitment to making a difference
P.S. Our strength is in numbers. Please help our efforts by forwarding this message to a friend.
Conservablogger comment:
We did, in fact, hock up the Lugar and spit him out. I'm not sure how the other RINO fared, but I'm sick of the established old Republican dead heads who go along to get along. They worry only about their reelections rather than the health and viability of our republic.
The Old establishment Republicans need to go along with the Progressive liberal Democrats. They are the reason our nation is in such trouble. Wanting to be fiscally responsible shouldn't be frowned upon, but it is.
They want us to compromise, but their definition of compromise is giving them every thing they want. Some one has to have the guts, and the leadership skills to cut the crap and get to work fixing our fiscal house.
We, The Tea Party, need to select people to run against the establishment who will get in there and assume the power the constitution gives us. We need to repeal much of the regulations that is smothering industry and forcing jobs out of America.
We've got to incentivize investment and ethical behavior in all government departments.
We've got to run the leaches out of Washington, and make it the limited government it is meant to be.
Savage Nation Misses Possible Reason for Obama Gay Marriage Announcement
For the first time ever, tonight I tried calling in to the “Savage Nation” radio program. I was unsuccessful.
Michael Savage, host of the radio talk show, was seeking theories explaining why (knowing how unpopular it was going to be) Obama would come out publicly supporting Gay Marriage.
Savage suggested two possibilities: 1. Shoring up support from his base, and 2. That Obama isn’t worried about getting re-elected because he knows the ‘fix is in’ on the election.
I have another theory that I didn't hear tonight. Consider Obama realizing he is facing an up-hill battle this November. He knows by now how wildly unpopular his Marxist policies are, and he knows he can’t distance himself from his former remarks regarding energy costs, anti-coal, fossil fuels, circumventing congress at every opportunity & his repeated crapping on the constitution; he feels he must do something popular.
Keeping this in mind, any favorable change of heart (in energy matters for instance) would be jumped on as a calculated and purely political move. No one would believe he has the capacity to have a ‘actual’ change of heart. Unless….
Unless he has a record of being thoughtful and having views that are in various states of evolution. He can now change his mind on any issue and say his feelings on it were evolving.
This makes me wonder how his views on partial (or after) birth abortion will evolve.
He can now reassure the American people that his Liberation Theology and Collective Salvation days are over, and he can point to his gay marriage announcement and say, "See, I can be objective despite political damage.
I expect Obama will cave on the Keystone pipeline project and approve it. I predict he’ll back of on certain rhetoric that most Americans view as intrusive and unamerican.
His Marxist, Communist, socialist (Progressive) colleagues as well as MSM, will be discussing how courageous Obama was to make such a historic statement; especially knowing it is politically unpopular to a large majority of Americans.
MSNBC’s Mr. Ed (the talking jackass) spelled out the liberal talking point tonight. In his story introduction, he said Obama is the candidate of equality, and Romney is the candidate of inequality.
Some callers on Savage’s radio show suggested the Obama confession is just a distraction. If we are talking about that, we are not talking about Obama’s failed policies and record.
What about the election results? Apparently, a company in Brazil is going to be counting our presidential ballots this fall. Do you believe the election could actually be fixed?
Let me ask you this, If Obama ‘COULD’ fix the election and guarantee his reelection, do you think he would?
What about Romney?
Michael Savage, host of the radio talk show, was seeking theories explaining why (knowing how unpopular it was going to be) Obama would come out publicly supporting Gay Marriage.
Savage suggested two possibilities: 1. Shoring up support from his base, and 2. That Obama isn’t worried about getting re-elected because he knows the ‘fix is in’ on the election.
I have another theory that I didn't hear tonight. Consider Obama realizing he is facing an up-hill battle this November. He knows by now how wildly unpopular his Marxist policies are, and he knows he can’t distance himself from his former remarks regarding energy costs, anti-coal, fossil fuels, circumventing congress at every opportunity & his repeated crapping on the constitution; he feels he must do something popular.
Keeping this in mind, any favorable change of heart (in energy matters for instance) would be jumped on as a calculated and purely political move. No one would believe he has the capacity to have a ‘actual’ change of heart. Unless….
Unless he has a record of being thoughtful and having views that are in various states of evolution. He can now change his mind on any issue and say his feelings on it were evolving.
This makes me wonder how his views on partial (or after) birth abortion will evolve.
He can now reassure the American people that his Liberation Theology and Collective Salvation days are over, and he can point to his gay marriage announcement and say, "See, I can be objective despite political damage.
I expect Obama will cave on the Keystone pipeline project and approve it. I predict he’ll back of on certain rhetoric that most Americans view as intrusive and unamerican.
His Marxist, Communist, socialist (Progressive) colleagues as well as MSM, will be discussing how courageous Obama was to make such a historic statement; especially knowing it is politically unpopular to a large majority of Americans.
MSNBC’s Mr. Ed (the talking jackass) spelled out the liberal talking point tonight. In his story introduction, he said Obama is the candidate of equality, and Romney is the candidate of inequality.
Some callers on Savage’s radio show suggested the Obama confession is just a distraction. If we are talking about that, we are not talking about Obama’s failed policies and record.
What about the election results? Apparently, a company in Brazil is going to be counting our presidential ballots this fall. Do you believe the election could actually be fixed?
Let me ask you this, If Obama ‘COULD’ fix the election and guarantee his reelection, do you think he would?
What about Romney?
Monday, May 7, 2012
Allen West Rally's Conservatives in Latest Speech
You MUST listen to this speech by Allen West!
I'm with Allen West! I want Allen West to run for president. I think he's what America needs.
Listen to this latest speech and ask yourself, "West or Romney?" If given a choice, upon whom would you be more willing to place your trust?
I'm with Allen West! I want Allen West to run for president. I think he's what America needs.
Listen to this latest speech and ask yourself, "West or Romney?" If given a choice, upon whom would you be more willing to place your trust?
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Leaked Memo Reveals How Unions Plan to Defeat Scott Walker
From the Conservablogger Inbox -
As you know, the right to decide freely whether or not to join a union was taken away from American workers by Congress almost 75 years ago.
While my colleagues and I continue to push for a roll call vote in the U.S. Senate on the National Right to Work Act, brave elected officials across the country are standing up to Big Labor.
Please read this urgent message from my friend Mark Mix about one of the most important battles currently being waged for worker freedom and how you can help.
Sincerely,
Rand Paul
U.S. Senator (R-KY)
As you know, the right to decide freely whether or not to join a union was taken away from American workers by Congress almost 75 years ago.
While my colleagues and I continue to push for a roll call vote in the U.S. Senate on the National Right to Work Act, brave elected officials across the country are standing up to Big Labor.
Please read this urgent message from my friend Mark Mix about one of the most important battles currently being waged for worker freedom and how you can help.
Sincerely,
Rand Paul
U.S. Senator (R-KY)
From: Mark Mix [mark.mix@righttoworkcommittee.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 1:39 PM
Subject: Leaked memo reveals strategy to take out Scott Walker
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 1:39 PM
Subject: Leaked memo reveals strategy to take out Scott Walker
"A leaked memo reveals Wisconsin Democrats' and Big Labor's battle plan for the June 5 recall election. Their campaign strategy: Don't talk about Wisconsin's government-sector Right to Work law.
One Democrat even admitted that the issue "isn't moving people" to their side. There's a simple reason for that. Right to Work is popular with the people of Wisconsin – and Governor Walker's reforms are paying off. And now the union bosses are desperate to talk aboutanything else. But your National Right to Work Committee won't let them get away with sweeping the issue under the rug. We're prepared to put Right to Work front and center in the recall campaign, but we need your help. The action of concerned citizens like you has repeatedly paid off in this lengthy battle. Over a year ago, your support helped encourage Governor Walker and the legislature to stay the course and pass the bill over the outrageous protests, teacher union "sick outs," and a Democrat legislative walkout. Your Committee alerted and mobilized Wisconsin citizens when Big Labor tried to hijack an election for the State Supreme Court, and later when they tried to restore a pro-forced unionism majority in the State Senate. Despite a $20 million campaign to recall supporters of the government-sector Right to Work law last summer, Big Labor-backed challengers in the recall election were terrified to even mention the forced-dues issue. We blitzed those districts with three separate mailings totaling almost 200,000 pieces of mail, making sure constituents knew where each candidate stood on forced dues, and asking them to call the pro-forced unionism politicians and demand they change their ways - and we followed that with emails and phone calls. The people of Wisconsin took care of the rest. In the end, only two of the six Republicans lost – but neither lost because of their support for Governor Walker's reform bill. One Republican who lost had been dogged by a tawdry infidelity scandal, yet his union-label opponent only scraped by with 51 percent of the vote - hardly a rebuke of employee freedom. Another union hierarchy-backed candidate won in District 32, where Barack Obama overwhelmingly won in 2008 with 61 percent of the vote. Without the generosity and commitment of Right to Work supporters in these battles, the union bosses and their allies may have succeeded in their schemes to take over the Wisconsin Supreme Court and retake the State Senate with forced-unionism proponents. And now that the union bosses and their allies are gearing up to spend even more in their desperate attempt to recall Scott Walker, those of us who support worker freedom must fight back. Tens of thousands of Right to Work supporters nationwide have signed Letters of Encouragement for Governor Walker, but that's only one step. We've got to be ready to once again bring worker freedom front and center in the campaign. You see, Big Labor and their puppet politicians don't want Wisconsin voters to think about Right to Work or how the reforms are already paying off:
It's vital we do everything we can to prevent a union-boss takeover in Wisconsin because this election could send shockwaves from coast to coast. You see, even though the Democrats and union bosses aren't talking about the labor law reforms now, if they end up taking out Governor Walker in the recall election, they'll turn around and scream at the top of their lungs that the election really was about Right to Work. They want to frighten elected officials and grassroots activists and stop the growing Right to Work movement in its tracks. We won't let that happen. Your National Right to Work Committee is prepared to turn up the heat - mail, phones, email and internet ads, radio, even TV ads if funding permits - to inform Wisconsin voters about the effects of the reforms and where the candidates stand. But we need help from concerned citizens like you to bring this plan into action. Please, click here to chip in with a contribution of $10 or more to help the Committee fight back. It's crucial we not let the union bosses drown out the voices of those who support worker freedom. Your action was critical in encouraging Governor Walker to stand up to Big Labor one year ago, and I know I can continue to count on you going forward. And you can count on your Committee - just as we did during the legislative battle, the judicial election, and the State Senate recalls - to make sure the issue of worker freedom versus forced-union dues isn't swept under the rug. I hope you'll act right away. Sincerely, Mark Mix P.S. The Big Labor-backed recall election against Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker is set for June 5. The union bosses and their puppet politicians are trying to sweep the Right to Work issue under the rug, but your National Right to Work Committee is prepared to fight back. Please click here to chip in with a contribution of $10 or more today. The National Right to Work Committee is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, single-purpose citizens' organization dedicated to combating compulsory unionism through an aggressive program designed to mobilize public opposition to compulsory unionism and, at the same time, enlist public support for Right to Work legislation. The Committee's mailing address is 8001 Braddock Road, Springfield, Virginia 22160. The Committee can be contacted toll-free at 1-800-325-7892. Its web address ishttp://nrtwc.org/ Not produced or e-mailed at taxpayer expense. To help the National Right to Work Committee grow, please forward this to a friend. To view as a web page, please click this link: view online." |
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
Forward. Communist ties? No Way!
I've been hearing that President Obama has selected the word, "forward" as his campaign slogan, and I'm shocked at the accusations that have been levied.
It is purely coincidence that Obama chose a word that is especially meaningful in Marxist, socialist and communist circles.
Are you familiar with, "The Great Leap Forward"?
The great Leap Forward was an economic and social campaign of theCommunist Party of China (CPC), reflected in planning decisions from 1958 to 1961, which aimed to use China's vast population to rapidly transform the country from an agrarian economy into a moderncommunist society through the process of rapid industrialization and collectivization. Mao Zedong led the campaign based on the Theory of Productive Forces, and intensified it after being informed of the impending disaster from grain shortages.
The above definition from Wikipedia talks a lot about redistribution. Landowners were stripped of their land which was redistributed to poorer people. Farmers were told what to plant, and so on.
President Obama never talks about redistribution; he never expresses his desire to spread the wealth around.
Then there is the...

What does that say? It says, "Under the leadership of the great Stalin - forward to Communism!"
But, this is purely coincidence.
It is purely coincidence that Obama chose a word that is especially meaningful in Marxist, socialist and communist circles.
Are you familiar with, "The Great Leap Forward"?
The great Leap Forward was an economic and social campaign of theCommunist Party of China (CPC), reflected in planning decisions from 1958 to 1961, which aimed to use China's vast population to rapidly transform the country from an agrarian economy into a moderncommunist society through the process of rapid industrialization and collectivization. Mao Zedong led the campaign based on the Theory of Productive Forces, and intensified it after being informed of the impending disaster from grain shortages.
The above definition from Wikipedia talks a lot about redistribution. Landowners were stripped of their land which was redistributed to poorer people. Farmers were told what to plant, and so on.
President Obama never talks about redistribution; he never expresses his desire to spread the wealth around.
Then there is the...
What does that say? It says, "Under the leadership of the great Stalin - forward to Communism!"
But, this is purely coincidence.
![]() |
| Young builders of communism! Forward, to the new successes in work and study! |
![]() |
| Under the banner of Lenin and Stalin, forward to victory of communism! |
![]() |
| Go all out and aim high. The east leaps forward, the West is worried |
![]() |
| Strike the battle drum of the Great Leap Forward ever louder |
![]() |
| Ride the wind and cleave the waves to realise a Leap Forward in all fields |
![]() |
| Let's march forward under the banner of Mao Zedong! |
![]() |
| Sing revolutionary war songs with fervor, and move forward in victory. |
![]() |
| Move fast forward! Construct and protect the Motherland. |
![]() |
| The motherland doing a leap forward. |
I'm sure the president was unfamiliar with this term in this context. It's a simple coincidence.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











